Monthly Archives: November 2013

Opposing Forces

The TV ad buying industry has recently become enamored with programmatic buying in hopes of lowering costs (media and service).  Programmatic buying works best when buyers can determine the value of an audience based on proposed cost, the size of the audience and knowledge of that audience.  Having worked with programmatic buying in digital I can tell you that the way programmatic buying will work in TV is by buying many smaller, more homogenous media properties and fewer large, diverse ones. That should mean media buys will be laden with “long tail” cable networks rather than lots of highly rated programs like American Idol or The Super Bowl. If set top box and shopper loyalty card data can be used to better understand the audience’s product purchase behavior it will be a boon for clients and agencies driven by ROI.

However, two opposing forces could limit our ability to execute on this. Both are pushes by government and consumer advocates. The first being the desire to unbundle cable TV packages—allowing a la carte channel selection–in the hopes of lowering subscription costs. The second is the ongoing push for personal data privacy.

A la carte cable selection will have major impact on many long tail cable nets who will have a tough time surviving. Will people choose to pay for networks that they rarely watch or will they select only the networks that they routinely watch?

Privacy concerns will mean less and less data will be captured and shared about people. With less data we are forced to make less informed decisions than we can with more data. Privacy advocates fail to tell consumers that more data sharing may result in a) people seeing fewer irrelevant ads and b) fewer ads in total.

We don’t know where the chips will fall on this but it is worth watching how it plays out.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: